panerai 574 vs 620 | pam00512 vs pam00574 (ecru vs modern lume) panerai 574 vs 620 Yes, the new PAM00620 is now a smaller, slimmer, stronger, self-winding, steel throwback to everything that everyone enjoys about Panerai – its naval history of Italian frogmen riding torpedoes in the dead of night with large luminous tools strapped over their wetsuits. Draugiem.lv mobilā versija ļaus Tev vienmēr būt pieskāriena attālumā no Taviem draugiem, sūtīt viņiem vēstules, skatīties galerijas un sekot jaunumiem profilos. Ērti, vienkārši un bez maksas.
0 · pam00512 vs pam00574 (ecru vs modern lume)
1 · Introducing The Radiomir 1940 Automatic In 42 MM, And Three
2 · Considering a 42mm Radiomir 1940
Labākā vieta izklaidei, aizraujoša laika pavadīšanai un jaunu draugu iegūšanai!
Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum: Considering a 42mm Radiomir 1940 I have tried both on and much prefer the 512. The faux patina is much better than the traditional green in my view. Plus, also note that the 574 comes with a 22/18 strap, .
Yes, the new PAM00620 is now a smaller, slimmer, stronger, self-winding, steel throwback to everything that everyone enjoys about Panerai – its naval history of Italian frogmen riding torpedoes in the dead of night with large luminous tools strapped over their wetsuits. Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum: Considering a 42mm Radiomir 1940
I have tried both on and much prefer the 512. The faux patina is much better than the traditional green in my view. Plus, also note that the 574 comes with a 22/18 strap, whereas the 512 comes with a 22/20. Not a big deal if you swap, but I liked the less tapering of the 512. Between a 512 and 574, I'd probably opt for the 512, as I think the ecru lume can be dressed up nicer with gator straps, which is what I'd mostly put on this dressier size of PAM. That being said, I'm not sure if the 512 is still in the catalogue? However Panerai has just announced the 620 which is an automatic (vs the 512 being a hand-wind). The 620 has the '9', the 512 doesn't, the 620 also has 'AUTOMATIC' written on the dial. Which do you prefer? I took the plunge last weekend and bought my first Panerai, the PAM 574. I've been attracted to Panerai's timeless design and heritage for some time now, but I have been a little put off by bulkiness of the Luminors.
At Watches & Wonders 2015 Panerai officially launched new versions of the popular 42mm Radiomir 1940s that came out two years ago, containing the new manual-wind Calibre P.1000, replacing the P.999.
I'd look at the 574 or 682 first (I'm not a huge fan of the ecru lume + blue hand of the 722). If you'd consider a Rad, try to find a 337 or 338, which will wear even smaller. As for the Due line, there are a few to consider, if you want to go that route.
Seen here, the Radiomir 1940 3 DAYS 42mm in Acciaio (steel) and Oro Rosso (red gold) – PAM00574 and PAM00575. The 2 watches released at Watches and Wonder 2015 features a new P.1000 movement and comes in a 42 mm case size. A men’s dress watch or ladies’ timepiece, the Radiomir 1940 3 Days Acciaio 42mm PAM00574 and PAM00575 are the first watches to feature Panerai’s new calibre P.1000, a hand-wound movement with a zero-reset seconds. Yes, the new PAM00620 is now a smaller, slimmer, stronger, self-winding, steel throwback to everything that everyone enjoys about Panerai – its naval history of Italian frogmen riding torpedoes in the dead of night with large luminous tools strapped over their wetsuits. Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum: Considering a 42mm Radiomir 1940
I have tried both on and much prefer the 512. The faux patina is much better than the traditional green in my view. Plus, also note that the 574 comes with a 22/18 strap, whereas the 512 comes with a 22/20. Not a big deal if you swap, but I liked the less tapering of the 512. Between a 512 and 574, I'd probably opt for the 512, as I think the ecru lume can be dressed up nicer with gator straps, which is what I'd mostly put on this dressier size of PAM. That being said, I'm not sure if the 512 is still in the catalogue? However Panerai has just announced the 620 which is an automatic (vs the 512 being a hand-wind). The 620 has the '9', the 512 doesn't, the 620 also has 'AUTOMATIC' written on the dial. Which do you prefer? I took the plunge last weekend and bought my first Panerai, the PAM 574. I've been attracted to Panerai's timeless design and heritage for some time now, but I have been a little put off by bulkiness of the Luminors.
At Watches & Wonders 2015 Panerai officially launched new versions of the popular 42mm Radiomir 1940s that came out two years ago, containing the new manual-wind Calibre P.1000, replacing the P.999. I'd look at the 574 or 682 first (I'm not a huge fan of the ecru lume + blue hand of the 722). If you'd consider a Rad, try to find a 337 or 338, which will wear even smaller. As for the Due line, there are a few to consider, if you want to go that route. Seen here, the Radiomir 1940 3 DAYS 42mm in Acciaio (steel) and Oro Rosso (red gold) – PAM00574 and PAM00575. The 2 watches released at Watches and Wonder 2015 features a new P.1000 movement and comes in a 42 mm case size.
 .jpg)
pam00512 vs pam00574 (ecru vs modern lume)
Introducing The Radiomir 1940 Automatic In 42 MM, And Three
Considering a 42mm Radiomir 1940
10 talking about this
panerai 574 vs 620|pam00512 vs pam00574 (ecru vs modern lume)
